找回密码 注册
食学宝(食品微课) 食品展会 食品人才 食品邦(技术交易)
食品有意思 食育网 食品会议培训中心 联食认证
化妆品伙伴网 食品专业翻译 食品安全合规服务 酒业信息网
查看: 13682|回复: 17

本人练习翻译的文章---关于减肥食品的

[复制链接]
(大牛)

该用户从未签到

5

主题

501

帖子

1178

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4Rank: 4

特邀主讲人认证会员

发表于 2007-1-16 21:38 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式 |阅读模式 |发表于:上海
分享:
Differential fermentation of glucose-based carbohydrates in vitro by human faecal bacteria
-----A study of pyrodextrinised starches from different sources*
Summary :Background Pyrodextrins, modified starches produced by heat/acid reatment,have been used extensively in the paper industry. Recently,pyrodextrinisation has been recognised as a way of producing a “resistant starch”that is watersoluble and has non-starch linkages.However, a full characterization of the fermentation properties of pyrodextrins has not been reported.Aim of the study To evaluate the effect of pyrodextrinisation on the fermentation characteristics of starches,prepared from Venezuelan crops, in a simple in vitro model of the human colon.Methods Potato,lentil and cocoyam pyrodextrins were produced using heat (140 °C for 3 h) and hydrochloric acid as catalyst (1.82 g/kg starch).Then, both native and modified starches were pre-digested with pepsin and pancreatic enzymes and their resistant components fermented anaerobically using human faeces as inocula for 24 h.Short-chain fatty acids (SCFA),pH,residual starch and carbohydrate in the cultures were measured. Results More than 69% of initial carbohydrate disappeared from both pre-digested native and pyroconverted starch cultures.More than 6.8 and 10.0 mmol net SCFA per gram carbohydrate were produced from pre-digested native and pyrodextrinised starches, respectively. In cultures of predigested pyrodextrins, the molar ratio for propionate doubled,whereas the ratio of acetate decreased by 25% when compared with pre-digested native starches.The ratio of butyrate did not change. Conclusions The mechanism for the change in SCFA profile is unclear,but may be related to solubility and/or presence of nonstarch linkages.The presence of these bonds may modify the accessibility/ affinity of bacterial enzymes to the modified starch structure.
Key words :pyrodextrin – shortchain fatty acids – modified starch– pyroconversion – colonic fermentation
Introduction
Starch modification techniques have been developed for industrial processing to produce a wide range of potential food ingredients, including pyrodextrinised starches. However, interest in modified starches has been restricted mainly to technological aspects with little concern about the possible impact of the modification on the digestibility and fermentability of the product[1, 2].
Pyrodextrins are produced by reactions that take place under the influence of heat, often in the presence of catalytic amounts of ions. These modified  arches were first reported nearly 200 years ago, as a water soluble and gummy material from the roasting of starch [3].Native starch is composed of glucose units linked by α(1→4) and α(1→6) glycosidic bonds,which can be broken down by the digestive enzymes present in the small intestine. Starch pyrodextrinisation occurs because of hydrolysis, transglucosidation and, in some cases, repolymerisation reactions of glucans. After hydrolysis,the new reducing end group of the glucose chain becomes a glucosyl cation,which can undergo either intermolecular bond formation between two chains or intramolecular dehydration, leading to the formation of 1,6-anhydro-β-D-glucose [4, 5]. Therefore, pyroconverted starches are branched, low molecular weight products showing new glycosidic linkages. It is claimed in the European patent EP 0 540 421 A1 that the non-digestible fraction of a potato pyrodextrin had one-third of its glucose residues at the non-reducing end of a chain, and one-sixth of glucose residues presented atypical linkages, such as (1→3) and (1→2). In addition, four main groups of molecular size for pyrodextrinised maize starch with apparent Mw at 5,000; 10,000; 19,000 and 40,000 have been described [6].
Although it has been recognised for some time that pyrodextrins prepared without any catalyst added were resistant to digestion [7],data about the digestibility and fermentability of pyrodextrins (with or without catalyst) are not readily available. Recently, other authors have found not only that acid catalysed pyroconversion promoted the generation of a significant proportion of non-digestible fractions (around 60%), but also these changes differed in magnitude depending on the starch source [2, 6]. A decrease in rat caecal content pH and an increase in butyrate was reported when rats were fed with corn pyrodextrin enriched diet in comparison with a corn fibre diet [8].However, full characterisation of the fermentation of pyrodextrins from other plant sources and in comparison to their native starches has not been reported.In recent years, resistant starches have been recognized for the contribution they can make to human health throughout their interaction with the gut. In particular,the increased butyrate production as this shortchain fatty acid (SCFA) may have anticancer and anti-inflammatory effects on the colo-rectal mucosa [9,10].Pyrodextrinised starches share some of the properties of resistant starch. They are partially fermented, producing more butyrate than non-starch polysaccharides and a low colonic pH [8]. On the other hand, pyrodextrinised starch, but not resistant starch [11], decreased gut transit time in rats [12] and may lower serum cholesterol and neutral fat in humans [13]. As pyrodextrinised starches have different glycosidic bonds from resistant starch, they may be fermented by different bacterial species and both the process and end result of fermentation may differ.
The aim of this work, therefore,was to evaluate the effect of pyrodextrinisation on the fermentation characteristics of starches,prepared from potato, lentil and cocoyam,as a substrate in a simple in vitro model of the human colon.
用人体排泄物中的微生物对以葡萄糖为基本单元的碳水化合物进行体外发酵
——不同来源的焦糊精淀粉抗消化性的研究
摘要:背景 焦糊精是一种热或者酸处理的变性淀粉,被广泛用于造纸工业。目前,焦糊精被认为是抗性淀粉的一种,抗性淀粉是一种水溶性的有非淀粉链的淀粉。然而关于焦糊精发酵性的全部特点的研究还未见报道。研究目的 提高作为淀粉的焦糊精的发酵性(由委内瑞拉的作物制得),通过对人体结肠的一种简单的体外模拟来进行。方法 以土豆,小扁豆和cocoyam为生料,用盐酸(1.82g/㎏淀粉)作催化剂在140℃下处理3个小时。然后把生淀粉和变性淀粉与胃蛋白酶和胰酶以及它们的抗性成分一起放在人排泄物为营养的培养基上厌氧发酵24h。测定培养基中的短链脂肪酸(SCFA),pH,剩余淀粉和碳水化合物。结果 超过69%的内源性的碳水化合物消失了不管是预消化过的生淀粉还是焦糊精淀粉培养基。预消化过的生淀粉和焦糊精产生了多于6.8和10.0mmol的净短链脂肪酸/g碳水化合物。与预消化过的生淀粉相比在预消化的焦糊精的培养基中丙酸盐的摩尔百分比增加了一倍,而乙酸盐的量却减少了25%。丁酸盐的量没有变化。结论 短链脂肪酸变化的机制还不清楚,但是可能和非淀粉链的存在和/或溶解有关。它们的存在可能改变了细菌酶改变淀粉结构的难易度/亲和力。
关键词:焦糊精 短链脂肪酸 变性淀粉 焦转变 结肠 发酵

介绍:
淀粉变性技术已经被应用于工业化生产一系列的潜在食品成分,其中包括焦糊精淀粉。然而人们对变性淀粉的兴趣主要限制在技术方面,很少关注其变性产品可能对消化能力和发酵能力产生的影响[1,2]。
焦糊精是热影响下反应的产物,通常还有大量离子催化剂的存在。这种变性淀粉早在近200年前,作为烘烤淀粉中水溶性的和胶质的物质见于报道[3]。生淀粉葡萄糖单元通过α(1→4)和α(1→6)糖苷键连接起来的,糖苷键在有小肠中消化酶存在下可以打开。淀粉焦糊精化的产生是由于淀粉的水解,转糖苷作用甚至在一些情况下会发生葡聚糖的重新聚合。水解后的葡萄糖链的还原端变成转葡萄糖基酶阳离子,它能作用于两个淀粉链形成分子间的键或者使分子内发生脱水,从而形成β-D-葡萄糖苷键[4,5]。因此,焦糊精淀粉被区分为:有新糖苷键生成的低分子量的淀粉。欧洲专利EP0540421AL 中说:在土豆焦糊精不能被消化的部分中有1/3的非还原端的葡萄糖残留,有1/6的残留葡萄糖由非典型的(1-3)和(1-2)糖苷键连接。另外,经过测定,玉米焦糊精的分子量主要集中在四部分,其重均分子量分别为5000,10000,19000和40000[6]。
虽然一直认为没有催化剂的加入制备的焦糊精对消化有抵抗能力[7],但是关于焦糊精(有或没有催化剂)的消化和发酵能力的数据很少找到。目前,不只是酸催化的焦糊精的不能被消化的部分有明显的提高(约60%),而且这些变化和淀粉的来源有很大的关系[2,6]。用老鼠来作实验得到,喂有富含玉米焦糊精饲料的比喂养玉米纤维饲料的老鼠结肠恒定的pH值和丙酸盐都有升高[8]。然而关于其他来源的焦糊精和它们生淀粉的所有发酵性的比较还未见报道。
近几年,抗性淀粉因其能和肠到相互作用而使人保持健康的贡献而被人们所认识。特别是丙酸盐产量和短链脂肪酸的增加可能有抗癌和抗发酵的作用,它们能作用与结肠盲肠的黏膜[9,10]。焦糊精淀粉和抗性淀粉在性质上有共同之处。它们都是部分发酵,比生淀粉产生更多的丙酸盐和较低的结肠pH[8]。另外,抗性淀粉没有[11]而焦糊精淀粉独有的优点是:延长了老鼠黏膜的运输时间[12],在人体有降低血浆胆固醇和产生中性脂肪的作用[13]。因为焦糊精淀粉和抗性淀粉有不同的糖苷键,它们可能是由不同的细菌发酵的,其发酵过程和结果可能是不同的。
因此,本实验的目的就是提高土豆,小扁豆和cocoyam淀粉制得的焦糊精淀粉的发酵特性,通过对人体结肠简单的体外模拟实验来进行研究。

评分

参与人数 1粮票 +10 收起 理由
Garfield + 10 thank you for sharing your article ..

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

(大牛)

该用户从未签到

5

主题

501

帖子

1178

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4Rank: 4

特邀主讲人认证会员

 楼主| 发表于 2007-1-16 21:41 | 显示全部楼层 |发表于:上海
分享:
我放假之前和开学以后我会每天翻译一段外文文献的
当然,我还是个生手,请各位师兄师姐多多指教!
回复

使用道具 举报

该用户从未签到

0

主题

1124

帖子

3591

积分

金牌会员

论坛长老

Rank: 6Rank: 6

金牌会员勋章杰出服务勋章

发表于 2007-1-17 08:28 | 显示全部楼层 |发表于:天津
分享:
原帖由 canzhaoliu 于 2007-1-16 21:41 发表
我放假之前和开学以后我会每天翻译一段外文文献的
当然,我还是个生手,请各位师兄师姐多多指教!


thank you for sharing your article

we are all looking forward to the next.
回复

使用道具 举报

(大牛)

该用户从未签到

5

主题

501

帖子

1178

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4Rank: 4

特邀主讲人认证会员

 楼主| 发表于 2007-1-17 20:57 | 显示全部楼层 |发表于:上海
分享:

今天就再发1/3好了,明天我再把后面的discussion部分传上来

Materials and methods
■ Starch sources
Lentil (Lens esculenta Medic.) seeds and cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium(L.) Schott.) roots were purchased from a local market in Caracas (Venezuela). Commercially isolated potato starch was purchased from Lyckeby Starkelsen (Kristianstad, Sweden).
■ Starch isolation
Starch was isolated as described elsewhere [14]. Briefly,decorticated lentil grains or peeled and diced cocoyam roots were homogenised in a liquidiser using one volume of water.The suspension was filtered through a 280-mesh cloth several times (usually 7 times), each time adding one volume of water, until no material passed through the cloth. The filtered material (essentially starch) was washed out with an equal volume of water,three or four times by centrifugation (1,500 g for 15 min), removing the lipid layer out of the surface in each centrifugation step until none appeared.Before the last washing,the pH was adjusted to neutrality.Then,the starch was dried in an oven at 45 °C for 24 h, sieved out(250 μm pore), and stored at room temperature. Additionally,lentil grains were steeped in 62.5mmol/l NaOH solution for 24 h at room temperature and washed out extensively afterwards, as a pretreatment to facilitate the peeling of the grains. Yield was 24 % and 45 % (d. b.) for lentil and cocoyam starches, respectively. It was low as the method used [14] was developed for the isolation of amaranth starch and no attempt to improve the yield for other sources was made because the emphasis was put on a high starch purity. The estimated starch content of the preparations used in this study was 94.7 % and 96.8 % for lentil and cocoyam, respectively [6].Additionally, the protein content was 0.24% for lentil [15] and 0.56% for cocoyam[16] starches. Therefore, the starting materials for the pyrodextrinisation step were mainly starch and the impact of other components, such as antinutritional factors,was most likely minor.
■ Starch pyrodextrinisation
Isolated starches (22 g) were sprayed with 0.5ml HCl(1.82 g acid/kg starch), mixed thoroughly and left overnight at room temperature. Then, they were heated at 140 °C for 3 h, milled and sieved through a 250 μm pore size mesh [17].
■ Starch pre-digestion
To remove the digestible starch, both native and pyrodextrinisedstarches were pre-digested using an Englyst starch kit (Englyst Carbohydrate Services Ltd,Cambridge,UK) with some protocol modifications. Briefly,0.8 g starch and 50 mg guar gum were weighed in a centrifuge tube, then 10 ml of 5 g/l pepsin suspension in 50 mmol/l HCl were added, vortex mixed and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C.To simulate small intestinal digestion,five glass balls and 10 ml 0.25 mol/l sodium acetate solution were added to each tube and they were shaken well by hand.After equilibrating at 37 °C, an enzyme mixture(pancreatin from porcine pancreas, amyloglucosidase from Aspergillus niger and invertase from yeast; 5ml)was added and incubated for 2 h in a shaking water bath(70 strokes/min).Then,the glass balls were taken out and the tubes were spun at 1,500 g for 5min. The non-digestiblefraction from the pre-digested native starches was recovered from the pellets, freeze-dried, pooled,milled in a mortar, and used for the fermentation experimentsThis fraction contained the resistant starch, as defined by Englyst et al. [18], and guar gum.In contrast, the non-digestible fraction from the predigested pyrodextrinised starches remained in the supernatant after centrifugation, due to their solubility in water.However, as the products of the pre-digestion step were also present in the supernatant, these were removed by dialysis (overnight dialysis against water at 4 °C, followed by five 1-hour repeat dialysis steps with stirring) using dialysis bags with small Mw cut off(2,000).Retentates were pooled, freeze-dried, milled in a mortar, and used for fermentation. This fraction contained the non-digestible component from the pre-digested pyrodextrin and the enzymes from the starch kit.As the SCFA profile was one of the variables studied, it was important to consider the effect of other fermentable substrates present in the system. Therefore,potato native and pyroconverted starches were fermented as described below, but without the pre-digestion step to look at the impact of the presence of either guar gum or the enzymes (from the starch kit) in the non-digestible fractions obtained from native or pyrodextrinised starches, respectively. There were no discernible effects of either component.
■ Fermentation of non-digestible fractions
Non-digestible fractions (and glucose, as a readily fermented control) were fermented according to Edwards et al. [19] in four to six independent determinations (actual sample size is given in Table 1). Faecal slurry was made using freshly voided faeces (within 45 min from evacuation),donated by healthy adults (34–36 years,one female), homogenised in 0.1mol/l Na,K-phosphate buffer, pH6.5 (pre-boiled, cooled and kept in an oxygen free nitrogen (OFN) atmosphere until used) using a liquidiser.Starch samples (100 mg for test cultures or none in case of control cultures) were suspended in 10 ml 160 g/l faecal slurry (previously filtered through a nylon stocking) in McCartney bottles (28 ml capacity). Each bottle was fitted with a holed, screw cap with a rubber lining to allow flushing of the culture with OFN before incubation.The bottles were incubated horizontally in a shaking water bath (50 strokes/min) at 37 °C for 24 h. After incubation, produced gas was released and measured using a calibrated syringe. A culture aliquot (2 ml) was used to measure pH and frozen at –20 °C for later SCFA analysis.The remaining slurry was boiled for 30 min and frozen to assess residual starch and carbohydrate.Time zero cultures were immediately boiled for 30 min and frozen to estimate total starch and carbohydrate.
■ Short-chain fatty acid assay
SCFA were estimated by gas liquid chromatography using a TRACE™ 2000 gas chromatograph (ThermoQuest Ltd,Manchester, UK) equipped with a flame ionization detector (250 °C) and using a Zebron ZB-Wax capillary column (15 m x 0.53 mm id x 1 μm film thickness),made of polyethylene glycol (catalogue No.7EK-G007-22,Phenomenex,Cheshire, UK). Nitrogen (30 ml/min) was used as the carrier gas. Internal standard solution(86.1 mmol/l 3-methyl-n-valeric acid, 0.1ml) and concentrated orthophosphoric acid (0.1 ml) were added to 0.8ml culture aliquots. The mixture was extracted three times with 3ml diethyl ether each time, centrifuged and the ether layers pooled. One microlitre of ether extract was automatically injected (230 °C, splitless) into the column.Then, the column temperature was held at 80 °C for 1 min, increased at 15 °C/min until 210 °C and held for 1min. The peak integrals were analysed using Chrom-Card 32-bit software version 1.07β5 (2000) by ThermoQuest (Milan, Italy) using an averaged (n=5)response factor for each external standard(166.5mmol/l acetic, 135.0mmol/l propionic,113.5 mmol/l isobutyric, 113.5 mmol/l n-butyric,97.9mmol/l isovaleric, 97.9mmol/l n-valeric,86.1 mmol/l n-hexanoic, 76.8 mmol/l heptanoic and 69.3 mmol/l n-octanoic acid solutions, pH8) as calibration method.All the standards were from Sigma-Aldrich Company Ltd. (Dorset, UK), except acetic acid glacial,which was from Fisher Scientific (Loughborough, UK).
■ Starch and carbohydrate analyses
Starch and carbohydrate were estimated both before(total) and after (residual) 24 h anaerobic incubation to quantify the degree of fermentation. Total starch was measured using the enzymatic procedure described by Englyst et al. [18].Residual starch was estimated according to Edwards et al. [19] based upon Englyst et al. [18].These two methods are essentially the same and quantify the starch content as glucose released after an in vitro simulation of both gastric and small intestine enzymatic digestion. The specificity of the Englyst method,however,underestimates the “starch” content in modified starches such as pyrodextrins because of the presence of atypical bonds that cannot be hydrolysed by the enzymes used in the method. Therefore, measurement of carbohydrate by a more general, chemical assay was necessary to estimate the degree of fermentation of the pre-digested pyrodextrins.Total and residual carbohydrates were estimated, by sampling from the same preparations made for total and residual starch analyses, using the anthrone-sulphuric acid method,which is a suitable method for the estimation of glucose-based carbohydrates like starches [20,21]. A modification was made to perform the assay into 96-well microtitration plates. The reaction was carried out mixing 40 μl sample, standard or blank with 100 μl 10.3 mmol/l anthrone in concentrated sulphuric acid and incubated at 92 °C for 3min. It has been shown that these assay conditions are able to quantify high molecular weight polymers like commercial soluble starch [21].Absorbance at 630 nm was read using a Dynatech MR5000 microplate reader and analysed with Dynatec Reader software version 1.1 (Dynatech Laboratories Inc., Chantilly, VA, USA). An appropriate calibration curve was made with each plate using glucose as standard[21]. Standard solutions for both starch and carbohydrate determinations were prepared dissolving glucose in slurry supernatants (1,500 g for 5min) from control cultures at time zero.
■ Statistical analysis
Variables were described as mean ± standard deviation.Statistical analysis was made using Minitab  for Windows software, release 10.51 Xtra (Minitab Inc., State College,PA,USA).One- or two-sided unpaired t-test was  used to compare means of pre-digested pyrodextrinised against pre-digested native starches where appropriate.A probability level less than 0.05 was used to indicate a significant difference between means.
Results
■ Fermentation of native and pyrodextrinised starches
The fermentation properties of both pre-digested native and pyrodextrinised starches from several sources after 24 h in vitro anaerobic incubation with human faeces are shown in Table 1. In cultures containing the pre-digested native starches, 99, 98, and 95% of potato, lentil, and cocoyam starches, respectively, were fermented. Although a similar trend was found for the pre-digested pyrodextrinised samples, the modified starch was measured as carbohydrate content by a chemical method [21] to overcome the specificity of the enzymatic starch assay[18].With this approach, 77, 75, and 81% of the carbohydrate in potato, lentil, and cocoyam pre-digested pyrodextrins were fermented, respectively.
■ Total SCFA
The net total SCFA, estimated as mmol/l of fermentedculture, was similar for all starches (Table 1). Comparable amounts were produced using glucose as substrate (58.8±4.4 mmol/l, n=6).However,when net total SCFA were corrected for initial culture carbohydrate content,SCFA production remained similar for all the pre-digested native starch sources, but the total SCFA for the pre-digested pyrodextrinised starches were significantly higher (between 43% and 75%) than their corresponding predigested native starches (p<0.023,one-sided t-test). Control cultures (n=6), i. e. those fermented without starch samples, produced 32.4±9.1 mmol/l of total SCFA, achieved pH 6.5±0.1and produced 7±3ml gas.
■        Molar proportions of SCFA
All pre-digested pyrodextrins showed a significantly higher (p<0.017, one-sided t-test) molar ratio of propionate (around twofold) when fermented compared with their pre-digested native starch. In addition, the acetate molar ratio decreased (p<0.04, one-sided t-test) by about 24% (Table 1). There was no difference in the nbutyrate molar proportion (p>0.82).
■ Fall in pH and gas produced       
The culture pH was 6.6±0.1 (n=6) at time zero. After fermentation, all the cultures showed a decrease in pH, but the fall in pH was significantly less for the pre-digested pyroconverted samples (p<0.03, one-sided ttest). The fall in pH observed for glucose (1.7±0.3,n=6)was similar to all the pre-digested native starches (Table 1). The volume of gas produced was the same for all samples, including glucose (17±5 ml, n=6).
回复

使用道具 举报

(大牛)

该用户从未签到

5

主题

501

帖子

1178

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4Rank: 4

特邀主讲人认证会员

 楼主| 发表于 2007-1-17 20:59 | 显示全部楼层 |发表于:上海
分享:
材料与方法
淀粉来源:
小扁豆(Lens esculenta Medic.)种子和cocoyam(Xanthosoma
sagittifolium(L.) Schott.)根茎,从Ccaracas(委内瑞拉)的当地市场购得。商业分离土豆淀粉是从LyckebyStakelsen (Kristianstad, Sweden)购买。
淀粉的分离:
淀粉的分离参考文献14,主要步骤是如下:cocoyam根茎清洗干净,去皮切成方块,用1体积的水液化均质,浑浊液用280目的筛子过滤几次(通常7次),每次填加一体积的水,知道筛上物没有东西通过筛子为止。被过滤的物质(主要是淀粉)用等量的水洗,离心三到四次(1,500g/15min),每次离心后弃上层脂肪直到没有脂肪出现。最后一次洗之前先调节pH值到中心。然后,淀粉在45度条件下干燥24小时,过筛(孔径250um),在室温储存备用。另外,扁豆要在室温条件下用62.5mmol/l的NaOH溶液浸泡24小时,之后水洗,这样预处理更容易去皮。
扁豆和cocoyam淀粉的得率分别为24%和45%。与文献14分离苋菜红淀粉的改进方法相比得率是低,本文也没有试图去尝试其它途径来提高得率,因为本文的重点是高的淀粉纯度。扁豆和cocoyam淀粉的大约淀粉含量分别是94.7%和96.8%[6]。另外,扁豆淀粉的蛋白质含量为0.24%[15],cocoyam淀粉为0.56%[16]。因此,用于制备焦糊精的淀粉的主要成分是淀粉,其它影响成分如抗营养因子的含量是微乎其微的。
淀粉焦糊精:
取分离淀粉(22g),喷洒0.5ml盐酸(1.82g acid/kg 淀粉),混匀室温过夜,然后140度加热3h,用碾钵碾碎过孔径250um的筛子。
淀粉的预消化:
弃去消化淀粉,生淀粉和焦糊精淀粉都预先用Englyst淀粉酶处理(Englyst Carbohydrate Services Ltd,Cambridge,UK)。简要叙述如下:在离心管中称取0.8g淀粉和50mg的瓜儿胶,然后加入5g/l的蛋白酶和50mmol/l盐酸组成的悬浊液10ml,搅拌混匀在37度培养30分钟。为了模仿小肠的消化,加入5个玻璃珠和10ml0.25mol/l的醋酸纳溶液到每一个试管中并用手混匀,37度静置,加入酶混合液(猪胰脏的胰酶,尼日尔黑曲霉的直链淀粉水解酶和酵母的转化酶;5ml)水浴摇床(70次/min)培养培养2h。然后拿出玻璃珠离心管进行离心,1,500g/5min。从而不把预消化的生淀粉中不能被消化的部分去除,再冷冻干燥,碾钵碾碎,用来准备做发酵实验。抗性淀粉的含量参照文献18。
相反,预消化焦糊精淀粉中不能被消化的部分由于其在水中的溶解能力而保留在离心的上清夜中。但是预消化的这一步的产品也溶解在上清夜中,可以用透析袋除去小分子量(2,000)的。收集残余物,冷冻干燥,碾钵碾碎,以备发酵。这部分包括预消化焦糊精中非消化成分和淀粉酶。
短链脂肪酸作为一个变量来研究,它对考察发酵效果很重要。因此,土豆生淀粉和焦糊精淀粉的发酵过程如下所述。
非消化部分的发酵:
非消化部分的发酵是根据Edwards等的文献19有4到6个独立实验来做(样品的量见表1)。排泄物采自健康的成年人(34-36岁,有一个是女性),用0.1mol/l,pH值为6.5的磷酸盐缓冲溶液离心,缓冲溶液提前煮沸在oxygen free nitrogen(OFN)的环境中冷却并保存备用。在测试的培养基样品中加入100mg的淀粉样品,淀粉样品悬浮于10ml 160g/l的排泄物浆中并放于28ml的瓶中。每个瓶都有一个小孔,便于在培养前通入OFN。瓶子在37度恒温的水浴摇床中培养24小时。
发酵过程中产生的气体用校准过的注射器进行测量。培养基的量为2ml,培养基是用来测pH值和在-20度时分析短链脂肪酸。剩余部分著沸30分钟冻结来测定剩余淀粉和碳水化合物。时间为零的培养基样品马上著沸30分钟冻结测定总的淀粉和碳水化合物含量。
短链脂肪酸的测定:
短链脂肪酸的含量是有气相液相色谱来测定TRACETM 2000气相色谱仪(ThermoQuestLtd,Manchester, UK)。详细见原文。
淀粉和碳水化合物的分析:
淀粉和碳水化合物主要测定总含量和厌氧培养24小时后的剩余量。总含量的测定是采用酶解的方法见文献18。剩余淀粉含量的测定见文献19,也是基于酶解的方法。这两种方法基本是一样的,以葡萄糖计算的淀粉含量是在体外模拟胃和小肠酶的消化作用来测的。但是文献19的方法的特殊之处是:它包含了作为变性淀粉的淀粉,如焦糊精,的量,因为一般方法的酶不能水解非典型的糖苷键。因此,用比较全面的化学方法测定碳水化合物的方法,对计算预消化的焦糊精的发酵度来说是很重要的。
碳水化合物的总含量和剩余含量采用蒽酮-硫酸法,这是测定葡萄糖单元的碳水化合物如淀粉的一种较合适的方法[20,21]。改进之处是用微量滴定皿中进行。取40ul样品,100ul 10.3mmol/l的蒽酮浓硫酸,再在92度加热3分钟。这种方法的优点是可以用来测定高分子量的聚合物如可溶性淀粉[21]。在630nm波长下测量吸光度值,仪器是Dynatech MR5000,分析软件是1.1版本的Dynatech分析软件(Dynatech Laboratories Inc., Chantilly, VA, USA)。用葡萄糖做标准曲线[21]。淀粉和碳水化合物的标准溶液是发酵时间为零的培养基1,500g/5分钟离心的上清夜。
数据分析:
见原文
结果:
生淀粉和焦糊精淀粉的发酵情况:
不同来源的预消化的生淀粉和焦糊精用人体排泄物中的细菌进行体外厌氧发酵24小时的结果见表1。预消化的生淀粉培养基中99%的土豆淀粉,98%的扁豆淀粉,和95%的cocoyan淀粉被发酵掉。相似的趋势也在预消化的焦糊精淀粉中出现,采用文献21测定碳水化合物的方法测定淀粉含量和采用文献18的酶法测定都进行了测试。在土豆,扁豆和cocoyam的预消化的焦糊精淀粉的碳水化合物中分别有77%,75%,81%被发酵。
总短链脂肪酸:
所有淀粉的总的净短链脂肪酸的量是很相近的,以每升发酵培养基中的毫摩尔数来计算(表1)。和用葡萄糖做替代产生的量(58.8+-4.4mmol/l,n=6)比较。但是当用培养基中的碳水化合物的含量来做个矫正的话,会发现:所以来源的预消化的生淀粉短链脂肪酸的产量是很接近的,而预消化的焦糊精的产量却很明显的要高的多,在43%-75%之间。没有淀粉参与发酵的即发酵时间为零的样品产生的短链脂肪酸的量为32.4+-9.1mmol/l,最高pH为6.5+-0.1,产气量为7+-3ml。

评分

参与人数 1粮票 +10 金币 +5 收起 理由
Garfield + 10 + 5 thanks 继续努力

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

(大牛)

该用户从未签到

5

主题

501

帖子

1178

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4Rank: 4

特邀主讲人认证会员

 楼主| 发表于 2007-1-17 21:19 | 显示全部楼层 |发表于:上海
分享:
下面附件里是原文,PDF格式的。
有感兴趣的可以看看
另外上面结果里有一张表不能复制
我也放在附件里了
回复

使用道具 举报

(大牛)

该用户从未签到

5

主题

501

帖子

1178

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4Rank: 4

特邀主讲人认证会员

 楼主| 发表于 2007-1-18 21:51 | 显示全部楼层 |发表于:上海
分享:
Discussion
Maize, potato and cassava starches account for almost 90% of the starch produced in the world [22]. To widen the utilisation of underexploited crops such as lentil and cocoyam, produced in Latin American countries like Venezuela, as starch sources, it is important to study their characteristics as potential food ingredients. Previous work has shown that pyrodextrinised starches produced by the acid/heat treatment used here have a 55–65% decrease in the enzymatically available starch. Therefore, pyrodextrins are an excellent source of nondigestible carbohydrates [6]. Moreover, these pyrodextrins differ from other short-chain saccharides because they are composed of a complex mixture of starch derivatives, all with Mw below 105,000 as estimated by gel filtration chromatography [6].
However, the water solubility of the pyrodextrins caused an analytical problem. During the pre-digestion stage, the nondigestible fraction from pre-digested native starches is normally obtained as a pellet after centrifugation at the end of pre-digestion [18]. In contrast, the pyrodextrinised starches remain in the supernatant along with their products of digestion (mainly glucose) and with the enzymes used for the pre-digestion itself.A dialysis step with small Mw cut-off (2,000) was used to remove the digestion products before fermentation. However, low Mw pyrodextrins,which might be non-digestible and fermentable, were also lost during this step.
Consequently,pyrodextrins used in this work had Mw in the range of 2,000 to 105,000. Pyrodextrins do not belong to any of the three categories of resistant starch originally proposed [18]. Some authors have suggested new categories of resistant starch to include not only chemically modified starches [23], but also physically modified starches (like extruded
starch) and amylo-lipid complex [11]. Since pyrodextrins have different glycosidic bonds than those present in native starches, they may belong to the category that includes chemically modified starches. There was an almost complete fermentation of all starch samples under the fermentation conditions used[19] based on net total SCFA production, fall in pH,starch and carbohydrate content before and after 24 h anaerobic incubation (Table 1). Net total SCFA and pH for pre-digested native starches were very similar to those reported elsewhere for raw potato starch [19]. Although raw and native starches are not part of the western diet, they were used here for comparison purposes. The heat/acid treatment did not change the production of gases in the faecal cultures. Two approaches were used to assess the amount of substrate consumed during fermentation. An enzymatic, highly specific approach using Englyst method,as described by Edwards et al. [19], was used for the pre-digested native starches. On the other hand, a more general, chemical approach using a modification of the anthrone- sulphuric acid assay [21] was used for the pre-digested pyrodextrins.These methods differ in their specificity and they were used because the Englyst method underestimated the starch content of pyrodextrins,as shown under ‘Total starch’ in Table 1. This was possibly due to the presence of non-starch linkages (i. e.not α(1→4) or α(1→6) bonds) in such modified starches, which cannot be hydrolysed by the enzymes used in the assay. Regarding the SCFA profile, pre-digested pyrodextrin fermentation showed the high proportion of butyrate that characterises native starch fermentation [24], yet there was an increase in the molar ratio of propionate with  parallel decrease in acetate. Another study[25] has shown a lower propionate ratio in raw potatoand banana starches (resistant starch type 2) when compared with both wheat starch (digestible starch) and retrogradedwheat and maize starches (resistant starch type 3). However, differences seen in the present study were 2- to 6.5-fold larger than those previously reported[25]. The drop in pH was higher for the pre-digested native starches than for pyrodextrins (Table 1). This may be due to the higher proportion of acetate, which has a lower pKa (4.74) than the other SCFA, present in the native sample cultures. It is interesting to note that the only carbohydrate moiety present in pyrodextrins is glucose. The changes during pyrodextrinisation of native starches yield oligoor polysaccharides with lower Mw than native starches,along with the new glycosidic bonds. The extent of these changes depends on the condition employed [4],but usually render highly branched [13],water soluble,resistantto-digest pyrodextrins [6]. It is not clear why pre-digested pyrodextrins had a higher propionate production than their pre-digested native starches.However,it could be due to an increased solubility and/or presence of nonstarch bonds caused by transglucosidation reactions. The presence of these new,atypical bonds may change the starch structure in a way that modifies the accessibility and/or affinity of the bacterial enzymes to the bonds.
High solubility, on the other hand, may also be important. α-Glucooligosaccharide (branched pentasaccharide with 1→2, 1→4 and 1→6 α-bonds) and maltodextrin-like oligosaccharides (branched oligosaccharides with 2,000 Mw and 1→4, 1→6, 1→2 and 1→3 α- and β-bonds), both highly soluble and resistant-to-digest carbohydrates yielded similar SCFA molar ratio to the pre-digested pyrodextrins (Table 2) when fermented with human faecal microflora in vitro [26]. However, insoluble β-bonded fibres also show a SCFA profile similar to the pre-digested pyrodextrins.A molar ratio of 653:257:90 for acetate, propionate and butyrate, respectively, was reported when oat husk (44% cellulose, 50% hemicellulose+pectin) was used as fibre source in a diet for rats inoculated with human faecal flora [27].Oat bran (mainly β-glucan) [28] and cellulose [29] fermentation in vitro also yielded a high propionate molar ratio (Table 2). Acid catalysed pyrodextrins, as prepared in this study, are thought to contain a significant proportion of β-bonded glycosidic linkages, as shown for wheat starch heated during 4 h at 180 °C without addition of any catalyst [7].However, the presence of such β-bonds in acid catalysed pyrodextrins has yet to be confirmed.

In conclusion,pyrodextrinisation of starches isolatedfrom potato, lentil and cocoyam resulted in the productionof a soluble material that escapes digestion, but wasextensively fermented in vitro by the colonic bacteria of healthy adults.
回复

使用道具 举报

(大牛)

该用户从未签到

5

主题

501

帖子

1178

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4Rank: 4

特邀主讲人认证会员

 楼主| 发表于 2007-1-18 21:52 | 显示全部楼层 |发表于:上海
分享:

讨论部分

玉米,土豆和木薯淀粉是现在世界上主要生产的淀粉,约站淀粉总产量的90%[22]。为了、扩大淀粉的来源,如扁豆,cocoyam和产于拉丁美洲的venezuela等,研究这些他们的性质是很必要的。预先的工作也显示用酸/热处理的焦糊精淀粉比酶法得到的淀粉的产量要高55-65%。因此,焦糊精淀粉是一种很好的非水解的碳水化合物[6]。再者,这些糊精不同于其他的短链淀粉,因为,它们是淀粉衍生物的混合物,通过凝胶色谱可以知道它们的分之量在105,000以下。
但是,这种水融性的焦糊精却造成分析的困难。在预消化阶段,预消化生淀粉中的非消化部分通常是由预消化后离心后的沉淀部分得到[18]。相比之下,焦糊精淀粉就不同了,它还和消化后的葡萄糖以及预消化是时加入的酶同时保留在上清夜中。在发酵前的透析步骤,分子量小于2000的被从消化产物中除去。然而,低分子量的焦糊精,它们可能也是非消化和发酵的,在这一步也被除去了。所以,本实验所用的焦糊精的分子量实在2,000到105,000之间。
焦糊精不属于抗性淀粉现在分类当中三类中的任何一类[18]。一些研究者建议抗性淀粉还应再分出一类来,包括非化学变性的淀粉,物理变性的淀粉和淀粉的直链与脂类形成的复合物[11]。因为焦糊精有不同于生淀粉的糖苷键,应该属于抗性淀粉中化学变性这一块。
采用文献19的发酵时,即厌氧发酵24小时,几乎所有的淀粉样品均被完员发酵,发酵后和发酵前相比的话短链脂肪酸的量上升,pH值和淀粉及碳水化合物的含量却下降了(表1))。预消化的生淀粉的短链脂肪酸含量和pH值与文献19中关于原土豆淀粉的结论很相今。虽然原淀粉和生淀粉都不是西方人膳食的一部分,但是,在这里它们却是有一定可比性的。热和酸处理均没有改变在培养时产气的量。
本文用了两种分析糖的方法来测定发酵过程中底物的消耗。文献19中叙述的酶法用来测预消化的生淀粉。另一方面,文献21叙述的蒽酮-硫酸比色法用来测预消化的焦糊精。这里之所以不用酶法是因为酶法测得的淀粉的总量偏低(见表1中总淀粉一栏)。这可能是因为在变性淀粉中的非典型的糖苷键不能被酶水解的缘故。
我们再来考虑缎链脂肪酸,发酵实验显示预消化的淀粉生产丙酸盐的数量比生淀粉有明显的提高,但是乙酸盐的量却基本相同。另有人[25]研究显示生土豆淀粉,香蕉淀粉(抗性淀粉2)和小麦淀粉(可消化淀粉)及变性的小麦玉米淀粉(抗性淀粉3)都有较低的产盐量。由表1可知预消化的生淀粉的pH下降要比焦糊精的大的多。这要归因于乙酸产量的增加,在生淀粉培养基中,乙酸和短链脂肪酸具有较低的pKa值(4.74)
值得一提的是,焦糊精碳水化合物的基本单元是葡萄糖。生淀粉的焦糊精化会产生一些低聚的寡聚糖,其分子量比生淀粉的要低,并且焦糊精具有新的非典型的糖苷键。其变化的程度根据条件而不同,通常是有高度的分支,水溶解性和抗消化的能力。究竟为什么预消化的焦糊精比生淀粉有更高的产盐量目前还不清楚。可能是因为转糖苷键作用使其溶解度提高的缘故。这些新形成的非典型的糖苷键的存在改变了淀粉的结构,这阻止了微生物酶的接近或者是影响其作用。
另一方面,高度的水溶解性也是不可忽略的一个因素。通过对以a1-2,1-4,1-6a糖苷键连接的低聚糖葡萄糖和通过a1-4,1-6,1-2,1-3糖苷键连接的低聚果糖体外实验,结果见表2,可知:它们都有高的水溶性和抗消化性,和预消化的焦糊精有相近的产缎链脂肪酸的能力。
同时,根据文献27报道,以β键连接的纤维素也有和预消化的淀粉有同样的作用,乙酸,丙酸和丁酸产量的摩尔比为653:257:90(用橡树纤维素做的实验,其中有纤维素44%,直链和支链淀粉50%,作为老鼠的膳食来做实验)。由表2我们可以知道橡树(主要是β葡萄糖)和纤维素在体外发酵时也产生比较高的酸的摩尔比。在本实验中,酸催化的焦糊精具有β糖苷键的性质,文献7在没有催化剂的条件下180度加热4小时的小麦淀粉也是这样。然而,酸催化的焦糊精是否有β糖苷键还是没有被证实。

小结:从土豆,扁豆和cocoyam分离的淀粉的焦糊精化的产物是有好的水溶解性和抗消化的能力,但是以健康成人小肠细菌进行深层次的体外发酵实验还没有做。

评分

参与人数 1粮票 +10 金币 +5 收起 理由
Garfield + 10 + 5 加油啊

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

(大牛)

该用户从未签到

5

主题

501

帖子

1178

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4Rank: 4

特邀主讲人认证会员

 楼主| 发表于 2007-1-18 22:02 | 显示全部楼层 |发表于:上海
分享:
由于我是第一次真正自己翻译专业文章,所以感觉有点有心无力.以前虽然看文章但是从来没有翻译过,以前只是自己看懂就行了,现在还要别人看懂!唉!的确很难!
当然,这里还有很多的错误还请不吝赐教!余感之不尽!
最后我想说的是这篇文章有两个表一直粘不上,我把原文放在附件里好了.
对抗性淀粉赶兴趣的同仁咱们可以在一起多交流交流!
回复

使用道具 举报

(大牛)

该用户从未签到

5

主题

501

帖子

1178

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4Rank: 4

特邀主讲人认证会员

 楼主| 发表于 2007-1-18 22:10 | 显示全部楼层 |发表于:保留地址
分享:
原文放在附件里了!!!!!

A study of pyrodextrinised starches.pdf

219.02 KB, 下载次数: 18, 下载积分: 粮票 -1

回复

使用道具 举报

(大牛)

该用户从未签到

5

主题

501

帖子

1178

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4Rank: 4

特邀主讲人认证会员

 楼主| 发表于 2007-1-18 22:16 | 显示全部楼层 |发表于:保留地址
分享:
另外,
从明天开始,我将开始翻译一本关于膳食纤维的书.
这本书的名字是<complex carbohydrates in food>
原书书在这个英语版块有的,大家可以找找
回复

使用道具 举报

该用户从未签到

0

主题

1124

帖子

3591

积分

金牌会员

论坛长老

Rank: 6Rank: 6

金牌会员勋章杰出服务勋章

发表于 2007-1-19 08:16 | 显示全部楼层 |发表于:天津
分享:
原帖由 canzhaoliu 于 2007-1-18 22:16 发表
另外,
从明天开始,我将开始翻译一本关于膳食纤维的书.
这本书的名字是<complex carbohydrates in food>
原书书在这个英语版块有的,大家可以找找


楼主说的那本书是江南斑竹发的,在这里

http://bbs.foodmate.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系方式|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|版权声明|隐私协议|食品伙伴网

GMT+8, 2026-6-17 06:23 , Processed in 0.941235 second(s), 27 queries , Gzip On, Memcache On.

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2026 Comsenz Inc. 鲁公网安备 37060202000128号

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表